The difference between GIS and traditional systems for representing reality

Authors

  • Khusanova Mashura Islomovna Samarkand State Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Department of Geodesy and Cartography
  • Mamanov A Samarkand State Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Department of Geodesy and Cartography
  • Azamov G Samarkand State Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Department of Geodesy and Cartography

Keywords:

Communication paradigm, communicate spatial distributions

Abstract

The traditional approach to maps, the communication paradigm, assumed that the map was the final product intended to communicate spatial distributions through the use of symbols, classifications, etc.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Геоинформатика: учеб. для студ. вузов / Е. Г. Капралов [и др.] ; под ред. В. С. Тикунова. – М. : Издат. центр «Академия», 2005. – 480 с.
Геоинформатика / А. Д. Иванников [и др.]. – М. : «МАКС Пресс», 2001 – 349 с.
Бугаевский, JI. M. Геоинформационные системы : учебн. пособие для вузов / Л. М. Бугаевский, В. Я. Цветков. – М., 2000. – 222 с.
Шипулин, В. Д. Основные принципы геоинформационных систем : учебн. пособие / В. Д. Шипулин ; Харьк. нац. акад. гор. хоз-ва. – Харьков : ХНАГХ, 2010. – 337 с.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-12

How to Cite

Khusanova Mashura Islomovna, Mamanov A, & Azamov G. (2021). The difference between GIS and traditional systems for representing reality. Central Asian Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science, 2(1), 35–37. Retrieved from https://cajotas.casjournal.org/index.php/CAJOTAS/article/view/55