Instructional Leadership and Mechanisms for Assessing Management Efficiency in Modern School Management

Sherzod Nurmukhamedovich  Mukhamedov

Authors

Sherzod Nurmukhamedovich Mukhamedov Independent Researcher, A.Avloni National Institute of Pedagogical Skills

Keywords:

Educational management, instructional leadership, KPI, TALIS, VAL-ED, WMS, management efficiency, digital education, 360-degree feedback

Abstract

This article analyzes the priority areas for improving the management efficiency of general secondary education institutions through the prism of international experience and national practice. Within the framework of the research, the specific features of global assessment programs such as TALIS, VAL-ED, and WMS are studied, and the mechanisms of their integration into the educational system of Uzbekistan are comparatively analyzed. Furthermore, the pedagogical potential of the KPI (Key Performance Indicators) system introduced in secondary schools is highlighted in terms of enhancing the professional competence of school leaders and establishing data-driven proactive management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Hargreaves, “School culture, school effectiveness and school improvement,” School Effectiveness and School Improvement, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 23–46, 1995.

R. Ch. Khaliq and A. Iram, “Evaluation of principal performance in public and private sector schools,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 345–359, 2013.

L. Lashway, Measuring Leadership: A Guide to Assessment for Development of School Executives, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Corwin Press, 2003.

R. J. Marzano, T. Waters, and B. A. McNulty, School Leadership That Works: From Research to Results, Alexandria, VA, USA: ASCD, 2005.

O. N. Mercy, “Effectiveness of principal’s role performance in curriculum and instructional development in public secondary schools in Anambra State,” Unizik Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, vol. 3, pp. 112–125, 2021.

National Policy Board for Educational Administration, Professional Standards for Educational Leaders 2015, Reston, VA, USA: NPBEA, 2015.

J. H. Stronge, Principal Evaluation: Standards, Rubrics, and Tools for Effective Performance, Alexandria, VA, USA: ASCD, 2013.

G. S. Abdrakhmanova, “Diagnosticheskiy podxod i otsenka effektivnosti upravleniya sovremennoy shkoloy,” Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Kazan State Pedagogical Institute, 1988.

I. V. Gorbunova, “Sistemnyy analiz deyatelnosti rukovoditeley obshcheobrazovatelnykh organizatsiy,” Sistemnaya Psikhologiya i Sotsiologiya, no. 36, pp. 84–92, 2020.

V. I. Zvereva, “Kak otsenit effektivnost i deystvennost upravleniya shkoloy,” in Menedzhment v upravlenii shkoloy, Moscow, Russia: Pedagogika, 1996, pp. 45–145.

T. I. Pudenko, Upravlenie razvitiem obrazovatelnoy sistemy munitsipaliteta: opyt i problemy, Moscow, Russia: Institut upravleniya obrazovaniem RAO, 2007.

OECD, “Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS).” [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/en/about/programmes/talis.html

Vanderbilt University, “VAL-ED: Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education.” [Online]. Available: https://news.vanderbilt.edu/2008/10/16/a-val-ed-discovery/

World Management Survey, “World Management Survey.” [Online]. Available: https://worldmanagementsurvey.org/

UNESCO, “Education and Sustainable Development.” [Online]. Available: https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development/education