Experimental Validation of Earth Abundant Heterogeneous Catalysts Toward Sustainable Energy Conversion

Authors

  • Shipon Chandra Barman Department of Industrial Engineering Department, University of New Haven, West Haven, Connecticut, United States.

Keywords:

Sustainable energy conversion, heterogeneous catalysts, hydrogen production, earth abundant elements, carbon deposition

Abstract

Background: The clean energy sector needs hydrogen as its main energy carrier but
biomass-based hydrogen production faces obstacles because tar forms which damages catalysts
while decreasing system efficiency. The high catalytic activity of noble metal catalysts does not make
them suitable for industrial operations because of their expensive price and their tendency to form
coke deposits. Methods: Multiple heterogeneous catalysts, including Ni/Al₂O₃ and Ni/MgO and Fe
based and dolomite and alkali-promoted and noble metal catalysts, were tested experimentally in
this research. The fixed-bed reactor served as the experimental setup for hydrogen production and
tar cracking tests, which operated at elevated temperature levels. Gas chromatography was used to
measure hydrogen production and H₂/CO ratio and tar removal efficiency and carbon deposition
while conducting three separate experiments to prove their findings. Results: Noble metal catalysts
the maximum hydrogen at 64.5 vol.%, and Ni/Al₂O₃ followed with a 61.8 vol.% hydrogen yield are
produced. The tar removal process reached its peak efficiency with dolomite, which removed 93.8%
of tar while achieving minimal carbon buildup. The alkali-promoted catalysts showed the ability to
prevent coke development. Hydrogen production efficiency needed to be reduced when tar
cracking performance reached its highest level for every catalyst system. Conclusion: This study
shows that catalysts made from earth-abundant elements provide budget-friendly solutions that
match noble metal performance in durability. Sustainable hydrogen production systems require
combined or dual-catalyst approaches to attain their compulsory hydrogen yield and tar removal
and preserve functioning stability for protracted periodsle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. Abidi, K. R. G. Lim, Z. W. Seh, and S. N. Steinmann, “Atomistic modeling of electrocatalysis: Are we

there yet?” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci., vol. 11, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.1002/wcms.1499.

W. M. Aframehr, C. Huang, and P. H. Pfromm, “Chemical looping of manganese to synthesize ammonia at

atmospheric pressure: Sodium as promoter,” Chem. Eng. Technol., vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2126–2133, 2020, doi:

1002/ceat.202000154.

T. Banerjee, F. Podjaski, J. Kröger, B. P. Biswal, and B. V. Lotsch, “Polymer photocatalysts for solar-to

chemical energy conversion,” Nat. Rev. Mater., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 168–190, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41578-020-00254

z.

S. Bensaid, G. Centi, E. Garrone, S. Perathoner, and G. Saracco, “Towards artificial leaves for solar hydrogen

and fuels from carbon dioxide,” ChemSusChem, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 500–521, 2012, doi: 10.1002/cssc.201100661.

A. Chen, X. Zhang, and Z. Zhou, “Machine learning: Accelerating materials development for energy storage

and conversion,” InfoMat, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 553–576, 2020, doi: 10.1002/inf2.12094.

C. E. Creissen and M. Fontecave, “Solar‐driven electrochemical CO₂ reduction with heterogeneous

catalysts,” Adv. Energy Mater., vol. 11, no. 43, 2020, doi: 10.1002/aenm.202002652.

R. Fernandes et al., “Exploring the hydrogen evolution capabilities of earth-abundant ternary metal borides

for

neutral and alkaline water-splitting,” Electrochim. Acta, vol. 354, 136738, 2020, doi:

1016/j.electacta.2020.136738.

J. Gao, H. Tao, and B. Liu, “Progress of nonprecious-metal-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution in

acidic media,” Adv. Mater., vol. 33, no. 31, e2003786, 2021, doi: 10.1002/adma.202003786.

W. Gao et al., “Modulating electronic structure of CoP electrocatalysts towards enhanced hydrogen

evolution by Ce chemical doping in both acidic and basic media,” Nano Energy, vol. 38, pp. 290–296, 2017,

doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.002.

J. He et al., “Electrocatalytic alloys for CO₂ reduction,” ChemSusChem, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 48–57, 2017, doi:

1002/cssc.201701825.

Y. Hou et al., “Rational screening low-cost counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nat. Commun.,

vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1583, 2013, doi: 10.1038/ncomms2547.

C. Hu et al., “Earth-abundant carbon catalysts for renewable generation of clean energy from sunlight and

water,” Nano Energy, vol. 41, pp. 367–376, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.029.

H. L. Huynh and Z. Yu, “CO₂ methanation on hydrotalcite‐derived catalysts and structured reactors: A

review,” Energy Technol., vol. 8, no. 5, 2020, doi: 10.1002/ente.201901475.

M. Kuang et al., “Electronic tuning of Co, Ni-based nanostructured (hydr)oxides for aqueous

electrocatalysis,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 28, no. 52, 2018, doi: 10.1002/adfm.201804886.

J. Liu et al., “S-NiFe₂O₄ ultra-small nanoparticle built nanosheets for efficient water splitting in alkaline and

neutral pH,” Nano Energy, vol. 40, pp. 264–273, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.031.

D. R. MacFarlane et al., “Liquefied sunshine: Transforming renewables into fertilizers and energy carriers

with electromaterials,” Adv. Mater., vol. 32, no. 18, e1904804, 2019, doi: 10.1002/adma.201904804.

S. Min et al., “Biomass-derived self-supported porous carbon membrane embedded with Co nanoparticles

as an advanced electrocatalyst,” Renew. Energy, vol. 155, pp. 447–455, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.164.

A. Q. Mugheri et al., “Hierarchical fibrous bimetallic electrocatalyst based on ZnO-MoS₂ composite

nanostructures,” J. Electroanal. Chem., vol. 883, 115061, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115061.

D. L. T. Nguyen et al., “Progress in development of electrocatalyst for CO₂ conversion to selective CO

production,” Carbon Energy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 72–98, 2019, doi: 10.1002/cey2.27.

R. Parajuli et al., “Integration of anodic and cathodic catalysts of earth-abundant materials for efficient CO₂

reduction,” Top. Catal., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11244-014-0345-x.

R. C. Samanta and L. Ackermann, “Evolution of earth-abundant 3d-metallaelectro-catalyzed C–H

activation,” Chem. Rec., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 2430–2441, 2021, doi: 10.1002/tcr.202100096.

M. M. H. Shabuj et al., “Advancing personalized treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma,” J. Primeasia, vol.

, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2019, doi: 10.25163/primeasia.1110015.

Z. Shi et al., “Metal-nitrogen-doped carbon materials as highly efficient catalysts,” Adv. Sci., vol. 7, no. 15,

, doi: 10.1002/advs.202001069.

P. Sutra and A. Igau, “Emerging earth-abundant molecular complexes for solar fuel catalysis,” Curr. Opin.

Green Sustain. Chem., vol. 10, pp. 60–67, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.03.004.

D. P. Tabor et al., “Accelerating the discovery of materials for clean energy,” Nat. Rev. Mater., vol. 3, no. 5,

pp. 5–20, 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41578-018-0005-z.

S. Tembhurne, F. Nandjou, and S. Haussener, “A thermally synergistic photo-electrochemical hydrogen

generator,” Nat. Energy, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 399–407, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0373-7.

S. Thampy et al., “Earth-abundant transition metal-based mullite-type oxide catalysts,” Adv. Energy Sustain.

Res., vol. 2, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.1002/aesr.202000075.

W. Tong et al., “Electrolysis of low-grade and saline surface water,” Nat. Energy, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 367–377,

, doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0550-8.

Z. Wang et al., “In-situ synthesis of free-standing FeNi-oxyhydroxide nanosheets,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 395,

, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125180.

R. Xie et al., “Selective reductive annulation reaction by a cobalt nanocatalyst,” J. Catal., vol. 383, pp. 239

, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.01.034.

Y. Xie et al., “Blending Fe₃O₄ into a Ni/NiO composite for efficient electrocatalyst,” Electrochim. Acta, vol.

, pp. 225–232, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.136.

M. Yan et al., “Construction of hierarchical FeNi₃@(Fe,Ni)S₂ core-shell heterojunctions,” Nano Res., vol. 14,

no. 11, pp. 4220–4226, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12274-021-3531-8.

B. You et al., “Enhancing electrocatalytic water splitting by strain engineering,” Adv. Mater., vol. 31, no. 17,

e1807001, 2019, doi: 10.1002/adma.201807001.

W. Zang et al., “Heterogeneous single atom electrocatalysis,” Adv. Energy Mater., vol. 10, no. 9, 2020, doi:

1002/aenm.201903181.

J. Zhang et al., “Energy-saving hydrogen production coupling urea oxidation,” Nano Energy, vol. 60, pp.

–902, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.035.

M. Zhao et al., “Recent advances in graphitic carbon nitride supported single-atom catalysts,”

ChemCatChem, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1250–1270, 2020, doi: 10.1002/cctc.202001517.

C. Zhu et al., “Single-atom electrocatalysts,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., vol. 56, no. 45, pp. 13944–13960, 2017,

doi: 10.1002/anie.201703864.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-20

How to Cite

Shipon Chandra Barman. (2026). Experimental Validation of Earth Abundant Heterogeneous Catalysts Toward Sustainable Energy Conversion . Central Asian Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science, 7(2), 37–46. Retrieved from https://cajotas.casjournal.org/index.php/CAJOTAS/article/view/1662

Issue

Section

Articles